Experimental Reports:

Experimental Report 2:

Observations of vacuum fluctuations suggests the existence of Zero Point Energy (ZPE)

by Heliognosis


Recent experimental evidence would suggest that the elusive zero point energy (ZPE) vacuum fluctuations can be detected using an electric field. Initial data indicates that increasing electric field strength results in an increased coupling with the vacuum fluctuations. This has been determined by varying both the voltage of the electric field as well as by increasing the surface area of the radiator plate. With an AC electric field of 246V peak-to-peak, the vacuum fluctuations present themselves as a dynamic quasi-cyclic current oscillation in the very low frequency (vlf) and ultra-low frequency (ulf) range with a magnitude of 0.02%.

  Although Zero Point Energy Vacuum Fluctuations have become a well studied Quantum Mechanical concept, little experimental evidence has come forward in respect to the electric field. A recent study by R. Blanco, H. M. Franca, E. Santos and R. C. Sponchiado (1) in Physics Letters A, suggests that vacuum fluctuations for the magnetic field can be detected. These magnetic voltage fluctuations are shown to be experimentally distinguishable from the voltage fluctuations associated with the well known Nyquist noise (1).

While studying the electric field absorption in living subjects at a distance, a fluctuation was observed in the very low frequency (vlf) range. The observations were made using a metal plate charged with AC high voltage. Current flow to and from the plate was monitored using a high impedance, high gain electric current amplifier. Improvements in amplifier design reduced the "thermal Johnson noise" to a level two orders of magnitude lower than the peak-to-peak intensity of the fluctuations initially observed. An apparatus was assembled to study these fluctuations as shown in figure 1.

Figure 1

Figure 2

apparatus apparatus diagram


An ultra-stable adjustable DC power supply was modulated by a chopper and the pulsed DC oscillation was connected to a plate within a vacuum tube. The AC current flowing to and from the plate was observed using a current sensor. The current signal was half-wave rectified and filtered to remove the carrier frequency and then amplified. The average value of the positive portion of the current was then observed on a Tektronix TDS320 digital sampling oscilloscope. A second identical amplifier monitored variations in the peak to peak oscillator voltage. The whole apparatus with the exception of the scope was placed in a grounded Faraday cage to prevent interference from external electric fields such as 60 Hz. All power within the cage was provided by stacks of 12V gel-cell batteries.

The pulsed DC excitation field was a slow rise, steep fall 66 kHz waveform. The current sensor impedance was selected as 100kohm. The electrode utilized as the electric field radiation platform was one of the plates from a Raytheon JAN5R4WGB full wave high voltage rectifier tube. The surface area of one side of this plate was approximately 2.25 sq. inches.


An initial noise calibration test was performed with a small excitation voltage and with only the current sensor in place (no load). The input P-P voltage was 16.8V at test point (2a). The current sensor impedance was 100k ohms and the overall amplification was 50X. In figure 3, a 25mS per division trace shows the fluctuations in the current sensor voltage on trace 1, test point (1b), and in the oscillator voltage on trace 2, test point (2b). The plate current then has a peak-to-peak AC variation of 2.88mV/50 = 58 uV, 58 uV/100kohm = 580pA. The oscillator voltage has a peak-to-peak variation of 58uV. It is apparent from the traces that the current waveform is independent of the voltage variations.

amplifier noise

Figure 3

The battery bank voltage was then increased in steps allowing sufficient time for the voltage across the input R-C filter to stabilize. At each step, the AC plate current, input voltage, peak-to-peak current fluctuation and peak-to-peak voltage fluctuation were measured. In figure 4 the peak-to-peak current fluctuations are plotted against increasing input oscillator voltage. Figure 4 is a graph showing these results.

current fluctuation vs. osc voltage

Figure 4

In figure 5 the current waveform for the tube electrode at the maximum test voltage is shown. This measurement is taken at point (1a) from figure 2 without any amplification. The positive portion of the waveform shows the portion of the cycle when the electrons are being drawn out of the plate to create a positively charged electric field in the vacuum. The negative spike occurs when the chopper connects the plate to ground and the electrons rush back to the plate and neutralize the field. Since the current detector has a 20x attenuator at the input, the corresponding current scale is 200 uA per division.

vacuum current

Figure 5

Similarly figure 6 shows the input oscillator voltage. The voltage was measured at point (2a) from figure 2 without amplification.

vacuum voltage

Figure 6

Figure 7 is an oscillograph of a 50 second plot of the vacuum current fluctuations. This measurement is taken at points (1b) for the current (upper trace) and (2b) for the voltage (lower trace). As it can be clearly seen, the current fluctuations do not follow the voltage fluctuations. The current and voltage are both attenuated by 20x by the detector circuit and then amplified by 1000x. The overall amplification is then 50x. The observed current fluctuation is 296mV / 50 = 5.92mV. 5.92mV / 100kohm = 59.2nA. The peak positive portion of the current waveform in figure 5 is 290uA. This is a fluctuation of 0.0204%. For comparison, the voltage fluctuation is 0.0256%.

vacuum current fluctuations

Figure 7

Plates with large surface areas allow for the formation of much stronger electric fields at the same voltage as compared to the relatively small vacuum plate. For comparison, figure 8 shows the current waveform for a 300 sq in. insulated plate in air. This current is measured at point (1a) before rectification, filtering and amplification. The vertical scale is 400uA per division and the peak positive portion is 1.03mA.

large plate current

Figure 8

Similarly the voltage waveform and ultra-low frequency (ulf) fluctuations are shown in figures 9 and 10 respectively. In figure 10, the current fluctuations (upper trace) have a scale of 40nA per division. The peak-to-peak current fluctuation was 81.6nA or 0.0079%. The voltage fluctuation was 0.0081%.

large plate life fluctuations

Figure 9

large plate voltage

Figure 10

Demonstration of the vacuum fluctuation using the Heliognosis Model LM2

A commercial version of the above circuit, the Heliognosis Experimental Life Energy Meter LM2, was connected in the Faraday cage and operated from a 12V gel cell battery. The meter was allowed to warm up for 30 minutes before measurements were taken to insure stability. To rule out the effects of temperature, all the readings were taken over a period of 30 minutes and the temperature was monitored with a mercury thermometer. The temperature at the beginning of the experiment was 17.4 C. At the end of the experiment, the temperature was 17.1 C. The LM2 has a much stronger damping filter than the laboratory version used above to allow observation of the fluctuations outside of a Faraday cage. The stronger filtration reduces the observed fluctuations somewhat but also filters 60Hz more effectively. A smaller flat plate was first tested (40sq in) with the amplification set to x1000 and the rear switch in the large plate position (200kohm sensor impedance). A large plate, model LM03-AC, with a surface area of 300 sq in was next connected with the same operating conditions. The zero controls were adjusted for each plate to keep the average reading on the analog meter around 10%. The chart recorder output was connected to the TDS320 DSO and provided oscillographs of the vlf and ulf fluctuations.


Readings were taken with the oscilloscope in AC mode to observe the vlf fluctuations in the low Hertz range. These readings were taken over periods of 250mS and 1 second. The oscilloscope was switched to DC mode to see both vlf and ulf fluctuations together over a period of 100 seconds. Several readings in both modes were taken with the small and large plates and the averaged data is shown below.

Peak-to-peak fluctuations:

AC (vlf only) DC (vlf + ulf)
small plate 7.9nA 11.2nA
large plate 12.3nA 21.4nA
Figure 11 shows an example of the large plate AC fluctuations over a period of 0.25 seconds. As can be seen, the vlf current fluctuation is quasi-cyclic with several frequencies such as 11.5Hz, 25Hz and 40Hz. Electromagnetic interference such as 60Hz is effectively blocked by the Faraday cage and is not visible in the waveform.

life dc

Figure 11

Figure 12 shows an example of the DC fluctuations for the large plate over a 100 second interval. The combined vlf and ulf fluctuation corresponds to a peak to peak value of 21.4nA.

large plate fluctuation

Figure 12


From the above results it is apparent that the electric field around a vacuum plate fluctuates dynamically with a quasi-cyclic oscillation in the vlf and ulf range. The AC current to the vacuum plate varies by as much as 0.0204% within the input voltage and current range studied. The vacuum fluctuations were found to increase proportionately to the input plate voltage. It was also found that increasing plate area also increases the fluctuations. The effective conclusion is that the electric permitivity is not constant but rather a function of the local zero point energy vacuum fluctuations.


(1) Radiative noise in circuits with inductance 
Physics Letters A, Volume 282, Issue 6, 30 April 2001, Pages 349-356 
R. Blanco, H. M. Franca, E. Santos and R. C. Sponchiado